Assessing the Impact of Gifted and Talented Programs on Achievement
In this paper we determine how the receipt of gifted and talented (GT) services affects student outcomes. We identify the causal relationship by exploiting a discontinuity in eligibility requirements and find that for students on the margin there is no discernible impact on achievement even though peers improve substantially. We then use randomized lotteries to examine the impact of attending a GT magnet program relative to GT programs in other schools and find that, despite being exposed to higher quality teachers and peers that are one standard deviation higher achieving, only science achievement improves. We argue that these results are consistent with an invidious comparison model of peer effects offsetting other benefits. Evidence of large reductions in course grades and rank relative to peers in both regression discontinuity and lottery models are consistent with this explanation.
You have read this article with the title Is Gifted Education a Bright Idea?. You can bookmark this page URL http://universosportinguista.blogspot.com/2011/06/is-gifted-education-bright-idea.html. Thanks!
No comment for "Is Gifted Education a Bright Idea?"
Post a Comment