Frequent School Nurse Visits May be Telltale Sign of Bullying

Ω

School bullying, or what experts call “peer aggression,” harms both victims and perpetrators, sometimes even ending with tragic results that make news nationally.

In recent years, anti-bullying efforts have sprung up around the United States as policymakers try to tamp down the problem. But because bullying often occurs below the radar of parents and teachers, better ways to identify bullying must be sought.

Now, research headed by Eric Vernberg, professor of clinical child psychology and director of the Child and Family Services Clinic at the University of Kansas, has shed light on a new method for detecting school peer aggression — repeated visits to the school nurse with somatic complaints, illness or injury.

His results recently were published in the journal Pediatrics.

“In this study, there is a connection between how often kids self-report being the target or victims of aggression and how often they visit the school nurse over the course of the year,” Vernberg said.

The KU researcher found that it is not only victims of bullying who make more visits to the nurse — it is aggressors as well. In the study, Vernberg and his coauthors compared school nurses’ logs with voluntary questionnaires completed by 590 children in grades 3 through 5. Students were asked to “nominate” classmates who displayed hostile behavior toward others. (The students all were participants in a larger study of school violence.)

“We also found this to be true in terms of how often a kid was nominated as being aggressive with their peers,” said Vernberg. “The more they were nominated, the more likely they were to have higher number of visits to the school nurse.”

What prompts such visits to the school nurse? For both the aggressors and their targets, Vernberg said that stressful interactions could bring on somatic symptoms, examples of which include tension headaches, muscle and joint pain and chronic fatigue. Repeated involvement in bullying as the aggressor or target also causes stress that may weaken a child’s immune system, leaving him or her vulnerable to illness. Injuries that may or may not be related to peer aggression were a third reason for visits to the school nurse.

Vernberg characterized bullying as “actions taken by one person with the intention of causing harm to another person.”

“We also look for an imbalance of power between the two people, so that the person who is the target of bullying isn’t able to effectively stand up for themselves or fight back,” he said. “The third thing we look for is an ongoing relationship between people, so it’s something that happens over time and is repeated.”

Such interactions drive negative feelings that often linger with the aggressor and target long after an antagonistic interaction.

“It’s upsetting for the person involved in that kind of encounter,” said Vernberg. “It’s probably going to have some residual feelings such as, ‘This was unpleasant. I got in trouble for this. I have a problem with this person that may come up again in the future.’ It involves negative emotions.”

The KU study concludes that school nurses and pediatric health care providers should prioritize prevention, early identification and treatment of aggressor-victim problems and mental and physical health problems that can happen as a result. Further, educators and parents might consider bullying to be a possible reason for a child making frequent school-nurse visits.

“How might schools know that bullying is occurring, that there are chronic problems with aggression or victimization?” said Vernberg. “One way might be that people tell you about it. Another might be that you observe some of the indicators that would raise your level of concern. Frequent visits to the school nurse for any of these reasons would seem to be one of those things that would raise your suspicion.”
You have read this article with the title . You can bookmark this page URL http://universosportinguista.blogspot.com/2011/06/frequent-school-nurse-visits-may-be.html. Thanks!

Year-Round School Changes Family Summer Vacation

Ω

“The traditional summer vacation structure is being affected, positively and negatively, as more schools across the nation adopt the year-round school calendar," said Ken McCleary, a professor of hospitality and tourism management in the Pamplin College of Business. He and his former graduate student, Margaret A. Peercy, co-authored a case study on the topic. Their study was published in the May 2011 issue of the Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research.

The increasing popularity of year-round school has been attributed to several factors, including a desire to raise educational standards and the need to ease classroom overcrowding, McCleary and Peercy wrote. “When year-round school is implemented, its impact on leisure travel is felt when it comes to who goes on a family vacation, when and where families take vacations, and the length of the vacation.”

The co-authors, whose study was based on a survey of parents of students at Columbia Academy in Columbia, Tenn., noted that studies have shown that family vacations are typically 6-10 days long. “When a school system adopts year-round school, children do not have 10-13 weeks during the summer from which parents can choose when planning a vacation. Instead, they have three-week breaks that occur every nine weeks.”

Their study found that “85 percent of respondents said they took their major family vacation in the summer before year-round school, whereas only 40 percent said they did so after year-round school.”

Other findings include:

• Some families on a year-round school calendar have shifted their major family vacation travel season from summer to all seasons, but especially the fall. Others, however, continue to travel on their major family vacation during the summer break.

• More families are taking two or more family vacations per year since year-round school.

• Some families agree that they take a greater number of shorter vacations since year-round school but continue to travel on at least one major family vacation a year.

• Families found it easier to decide what time of year to go on a family vacation before year-round school.

• Families feel that they can get more for their money when they travel since changing to a year-round school calendar because of the time of year that they are traveling.

• Some families are more likely to allow their child/children to travel with a friend or invite a friend of the family to travel with them since year-round school than before.

• School extracurricular activities, such as sports, cause problems for families when planning for vacations.

The co-authors wrote that in 1986-1987, only 408 public schools in the U.S. were on a year-round system. Two decades later, year-round systems were in place in all but four states, in more than 3,000 public schools, with an estimated enrollment of 2.3 million students, according to a 2006 estimate by the National Association of Year-Round Education.

While noting that the lack of a standard school calendar — even within the same state — poses a major challenge to the leisure travel industry in responding to the changes, McCleary and Peercy said the industry “cannot afford to ignore the fact that year-round school families are taking a greater number of shorter vacations during school breaks, especially during fall and spring.” Developing and marketing 2-3-day vacation packages, for example, might be one way the industry can benefit.

The definition of a family may continue to change over time, they said, but “some form of a family will continue to travel and vacation together.” The family’s travel needs and desires will continue to change as the family ages. “Remaining ahead of the curve is one of the ways that businesses in the leisure travel industry will remain ahead of their competitors.”
You have read this article with the title . You can bookmark this page URL http://universosportinguista.blogspot.com/2011/06/year-round-school-changes-family-summer.html. Thanks!

High School-Level Teachers’ Preparation and Qualifications

Ω

More than three-quarters of teachers with English, mathematics, science, or social science as their main assignments taught all of their classes in their main assignments. This report, Education and Certification Qualifications of Departmentalized Public High School-Level Teachers of Core Subjects: Evidence from the 2007-08 Schools and Staffing Survey, examines the percentage of public school teachers who held an in-field postsecondary major, in-field certification, or both, in a selection of high-school level main assignment fields. Teachers of these subjects were considered to be in-field majors if they held a major that they had earned at the bachelor's degree level or higher in the subject(s) that they taught.

Among other findings, the survey found that about 75 percent of English teachers, 66 percent of mathematics teachers, 75 percent of science teachers, and 74 percent of social science teachers held both a postsecondary degree and certification in their respective main assignments.
You have read this article with the title . You can bookmark this page URL http://universosportinguista.blogspot.com/2011/06/high-school-level-teachers-preparation.html. Thanks!