Benefit of a mentor: Disadvantaged go to college

Disadvantaged teens twice as likely to attend college

Two findings from a new national study reveal the power of mentors, particularly those in the teaching profession:

For all teen students, having an adult mentor meant a 50 percent greater likelihood of attending college.

For disadvantaged students, mentorship by a teacher nearly doubled the odds of attending college.

The research will appear next week in the academic journal Sociology of Education. Study coauthor Steve McDonald, a sociologist at North Carolina State University, notes a harsh paradox evident in the numbers.

“Youth who are most likely to need mentors are least likely to have them,” McDonald said.

Their research shows less than half of disadvantaged students report having any adult mentor. Only seven percent had a mentoring relationship with a teacher.

The data includes information from more than 14,000 adolescents who participated in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health.

In the statistical analysis, mentors proved pivotal in whether students make the jump to college. For example, students whose parents do not have even a high school degree are normally 35 percent likely to enroll in college. According to the study, the rate jumps to 66 percent when the youth considers one of their teachers to be a personal mentor.

“Teacher-mentors close the college gap for disadvantaged kids,” Erickson said.

The authors point out that much needs to be done to help disadvantaged youth connect to the adults, especially teachers, in their lives.

“Comments from study participants indicate that their mentors weren’t necessarily doing anything extraordinary, just being involved and treating the young person as an important human being,” Erickson said.
You have read this article with the title . You can bookmark this page URL http://universosportinguista.blogspot.com/2009/11/benefit-of-mentor-disadvantaged-go-to.html. Thanks!

Baby Einstein Controversy

.
Language Learning Alternatives for Young Children

Baby Einstein videos have become a staple in many American households until recently when the Walt Disney Company decided to refund the product, acknowledging that these ever-popular videos were not intended to be educational or promote better brain development among young children.

Lucia French, Ph.D., a developmental psychologist who studies language and cognitive development in young children at the University of Rochester’s Margaret Warner Graduate School of Education and Human Development, says nothing contributes more to a child’s early development than actual parent-child interaction. “Babies learn language best when adults spend time with them, talking about things other than behavior,” says French.

French, who does not recommend any screen time for babies, says that research on language development has shown that young children acquire language from interaction with other people. “They may acquire a few individual words from a television show or video, but to learn to use language to communicate effectively, they need to interact with other people who are interested in communicating with them,” she notes.

She stresses that most children learn language readily if they are in a language-rich environment and that strong language skills are an essential foundation for eventual academic success. Parents can interact with infants and toddlers, and there are lots of ways to do that without using a video as a prop. She offers parents the following tips to help enhance young children’s language skills:

• “Housekeeping” talk (e.g. stop, come here, go to sleep, eat your food, etc.) is common language that every parent uses. All children hear about the same amount of it, but children who develop better communication skills and more vocabulary are those with parents who go beyond “housekeeping talk” to talk with the child about other things, particularly about recent experiences and plans for the near future. Exposure only to “housekeeping talk” deprives children of building two-way communication and a rich vocabulary based on conceptual experiences.

• Be positive! A lot of children hear many more negative comments than positive comments. Parents should use “extra” feel-good words and vocabulary that have affirmations in them, are responsive terms, have active listening, and have restatements of what the child says, as Dr. Todd Risley, from the University of Alaska, states in his book “Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experiences of Young Children.”

• Be sensitive to what your child is interested in. Research shows that when their parents play with them, children are more responsive and learn language more rapidly if the parent enters into the interaction by focusing on what the child is already playing with, rather than trying to redirect the child’s interest to something else.

• Remember that children understand a lot more language than they can use themselves. Their receptive vocabulary is much larger than their productive vocabulary.

• Be alert to whether or not your baby is interested in what you have to say. Babies who aren’t talking yet adjust the amount of language input they are receiving by withdrawing their attention if they don’t understand what the adult is saying. The younger the child, the more the adult needs to talk about the immediate environment, familiar objects, and familiar routines, such as bath time and lunchtime. As children grow older—12 to 18 months—they are increasingly able to understand talk about other places as well as the future and past.

• Babies and toddlers like faces, music, movement and bright colors, and while Baby Einstein videos offer some of these features, the screen time isn’t going to help them learn a language. Parents should look for other non-video props and activities that tap into these interests.

• Read to your baby two to three times a day. Reading to children under 9 months does not necessarily contribute significantly to language development, but it establishes the “lap reading” positive relationship that connects the child to the reader to the book. It is really the quality of the interaction that is important from birth to about 12 months.

• Use picture books for children under 18 months, and as language develops, the amount of text can be increased. This interaction is really about talking together with a book as the focus, rather than actually reading the words in the book. Many parents develop a format involving four parts: Adult getting child’s attention; adult asking a question; child responding to the question; adult giving positive feedback.

• As children become older, they enjoy both simple stories and non-fiction books that help them understand the world they live in.

French, a former Spencer Fellow and Fulbright Scholar, teaches courses in child development, language development, learning theory, and early childhood education at the Warner School. Her research explores the relationship between language and cognitive development during the preschool years, with emphasis on the roles of social interaction and prior knowledge. Based on her research, French has developed a science-based preschool curriculum to foster language development, learning, cognition, and school readiness. The ScienceStart! Curriculum capitalizes on children’s natural curiosity about the world around them to build the cognitive and social skills and knowledge needed for healthy development and academic success.

French is the author of Young Children's Understanding of Relational Terms: Some Ifs, Ors, and Buts (Springer-Vertag, 1985) and has published more than 30 articles in research journals and other articles in publications for early childhood educators.
You have read this article with the title . You can bookmark this page URL http://universosportinguista.blogspot.com/2009/11/baby-einstein-controversy.html. Thanks!

The new myths of gifted education

More than 25 years after myths about gifted education were first explored, they are all still with us and new ones have been added, according to research published in the current Gifted Child Quarterly (GCQ), the official journal of National Association for Gifted Children.

Providing specialized and organized gifted education courses was a relatively new concept in 1982 when an article entitled "Demythologizing Gifted Education" was first published in GCQ. Research at that time found that certain myths were widely believed, such as the idea that the gifted constituted a single, homogeneous group of learners, or that just one curriculum would serve all equally.

In "The Myths of Gifted Education: A Contemporary View," the journal takes a new look at the current state of gifted education. Researchers found that all 15 of the 1982 myths are still with us, though some have been modified over time, and several new ones have emerged. A few of the now 19 myths in this special issue of GCQ include:

Creativity is too difficult to measure
Gifted education means having a program
High ability students don't face problems and challenges
It's "fair" to teach all children the same way
Advanced Placement (AP) is an adequate secondary program


"The Myths of Gifted Education: A Contemporary View" a special issue of Gifted Child Quarterly (published by SAGE) is available free for a limited time.

A Podcast interview with the editor about the differences (or not) in the myths since 1982 is available.
You have read this article with the title . You can bookmark this page URL http://universosportinguista.blogspot.com/2009/11/the-new-myths-of-gifted-education.html. Thanks!